Hi, Including the tech-discuss mailing list for better visibility.
Cheers Georg From: Georg Kunz Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2017 1:06 PM To: Tianhongbo <[email protected]>; Georg Kunz <[email protected]>; Wenjing Chu <[email protected]>; Cooper, Trevor <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; Wanglei (Grakiss) <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; xudan (N) <[email protected]>; Tim Irnich <[email protected]>; Christopher Price <[email protected]> Subject: Feedback from Dovetail to Test WG Hi Dovetailers, In last week's test WG meeting, we talked about the relationship between Dovetail and the test WG in the context of the Dovestack proposal. Prakash was not on the call, but there was rather uniform agreement that the test WG is the forum for driving the evolution of test cases and test coverage in OPNFV - in particular for consumption by Dovetail/CVP. In general, the interaction between the test WG and Dovetail can still be improved. Morgan hence proposed to collect feedback from Dovetail towards the test WG and present it to the test WG next week. I have started to put my thoughts on this matter in an etherpad: https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/dovetail-testwg-feedback-collaboration I'd like to ask you to add your own thoughts and feedback to the etherpad. Hopefully, we can briefly talk about this in tomorrow's call as well. Best regards Georg
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
