Hi Tim, There were indeed many more processes than 12 per each openstack service. I'm running functest with the configuration and seems to run smoothly.
Could you find out why it hasn't been fixed upstream? I also looked at ci results. After Danube we made a number of refactoring patches and the version Apex uses is not recent enough (when I use latest Carbon the results look better). We also haven't merged all of the patches still, so this one is on us. Juraj -----Original Message----- From: Tim Rozet [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, 08 August, 2017 22:45 To: Juraj Linkes -X (jlinkes - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Fds-dev] [APEX] [Euphrates] Euphrates testing - database issues Juraj, Now I'm thinking this is the same problem as before. I see we had this in Danube: https://github.com/opnfv/apex/blob/stable/danube/build/baremetal-environment.yaml which we are not using in master because this problem was supposed to be fixed upstream. Can you try including this file in your overcloud deployment and see if it works? Thanks, Tim Rozet Red Hat SDN Team ----- Original Message ----- From: "Juraj Linkes -X (jlinkes - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" <[email protected]> To: "Tim Rozet" <[email protected]>, [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 11:44:16 AM Subject: RE: [Fds-dev] [APEX] [Euphrates] Euphrates testing - database issues The box is not OOM – it has more than 200GB spare. One thing I forgot to mention was that I let the setup as is for a day or two (without doing anything with it) and then the issue appeared. Juraj From: Tim Rozet [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, 04 August, 2017 16:09 To: Juraj Linkes -X (jlinkes - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <[email protected]>; [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Fds-dev] [APEX] [Euphrates] Euphrates testing - database issues Hi Juraj, This error looks different than the files limit problem. This actually looks to be an error in the python sqlalchemy call, complaining there isn't enough ram to spawn a session thread. Is your box oom? You can check the daily job's functest results. I believe it deployed that scenario in the last iteration. Otherwise ping me Monday with the setup and I'll try to debug. Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S®6 active, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: "Juraj Linkes -X (jlinkes - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: 8/4/17 8:34 AM (GMT-05:00) To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [Fds-dev] [APEX] [Euphrates] Euphrates testing - database issues Hi Apex team, I tried an os-odl-fdio-ha euphrates baremetal deployment and I ran into mariadb issues when I ran functest: https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/R4tBkzeub0N2ksYVMsabNg/raw I've seen this issue before when the number of open files was too low in mariadb, but I seems to be fine: MariaDB [(none)]> show variables like 'open_files_limit'; +------------------+-------+ | Variable_name | Value | +------------------+-------+ | open_files_limit | 20485 | +------------------+-------+ Has anyone seen this with any other scenario? Juraj _______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
