That mistake was what was fixed. It should be working now.

Regards,
Mark

Mark Beierl
SW System Sr Principal Engineer
Dell EMC | Office of the CTO
mobile +1 613 314 8106<tel:1-613-314-8106>
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

On Jul 5, 2017, at 22:34, Lvjing (Jing Lu) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hi Mark,
   I found in master, the StorPerf Swagger UI posts jobs GET API with 
“metrics_type” parameter instead of “type”, which also cause the problem when 
checking job status.
BR,
Jing Lu

From: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
 [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 吴之惠
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 5:04 PM
To: Beierl, Mark <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [storperf]Met a problem when checking job 
status

Hi Mark,

Thanks for your help. It works now.

BRs,

Zhihui.Wu

Beierl, Mark <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>于2017年7月5日周三 
上午1:28写道:
Hello, Zhihui Wu

The issue has been fixed in master.  Doing a docker pull of the latest image 
(or using the scripts in ci) should work again.

Regards,
Mark

Mark Beierl
SW System Sr Principal Engineer
Dell EMC | Office of the CTO
mobile +1 613 314 8106<tel:1-613-314-8106>
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
On Jul 4, 2017, at 09:54, Beierl, Mark 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hello,

This looks like a problem that exists currently in Master due to the Docker 
compose changes.  Did you use the scripts from Danube or master?

Use:

git checkout danube.2.0

to get the daily.sh that corresponds to the Danube container.

I will be fixing the issue with master today, if you prefer to wait and stick 
with master.

Regards,
Mark

Mark Beierl
SW System Sr Principal Engineer
Dell EMC | Office of the CTO
mobile +1 613 314 8106<tel:1-613-314-8106>
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

On Jul 3, 2017, at 22:39, 吴之惠 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hi, Mark

I run storperf test on an apex(Danube 2.0) virtual environment. Since it is a 
virtual environment with limited resource, I did some modifications:
1. modify the default flavor: change the RAM from 8192 to 2048
2. set CINDER_NODES = 2
3. set QUEUE_DEPTHS = 1
4. set WORKLOADS = rw
Based on these modifications, I run the storperf ci scripts daily.sh. According 
to the storperf.log, test cases were completely executed. But the process was 
blocked on checking job status. I attach the storperf.log here.
And I directly run the command curl -s -X GET 
"http://127.0.0.1:5000/api/v1.0/jobs?id=380f819c-b729-455e-b228-828a54c8b04e&type=status";
the return is
{
  
"_warm_up.queue-depth.8.block-size.16384.read.bw<http://warm_up.queue-depth.8.block-size.16384.read.bw/>":
 0.0,
  "_warm_up.queue-depth.8.block-size.16384.read.iops": 0.0,
  "_warm_up.queue-depth.8.block-size.16384.read.lat.mean": 0.0,
  
"_warm_up.queue-depth.8.block-size.16384.write.bw<http://warm_up.queue-depth.8.block-size.16384.write.bw/>":
 17200.25,
  "_warm_up.queue-depth.8.block-size.16384.write.iops": 1075.115,
  "_warm_up.queue-depth.8.block-size.16384.write.lat.mean": 7445.6625,
  
"rw.queue-depth.1.block-size.1024.read.bw<http://rw.queue-depth.1.block-size.1024.read.bw/>":
 344.7083333333333,
  "rw.queue-depth.1.block-size.1024.read.iops": 345.30750000000006,
  "rw.queue-depth.1.block-size.1024.read.lat.mean": 969.1866666666665,
  
"rw.queue-depth.1.block-size.1024.write.bw<http://rw.queue-depth.1.block-size.1024.write.bw/>":
 147.875,
  "rw.queue-depth.1.block-size.1024.write.iops": 148.21291666666664,
  "rw.queue-depth.1.block-size.1024.write.lat.mean": 4475.600833333333
}
The return doesn't include status information. Any ideas about it?

Thanks!

Zhihui.Wu

<storperf.log>

_______________________________________________
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

<ss.png>
_______________________________________________
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Reply via email to