Hi Folks,
Did we come to any conclusions on a couple of outstanding points that come to
my mind as things to come to decisions on as they establish our technical scope:
1) Is it OK for instance that test cases only evaluate API responses? I am
thinking of suites like the IPv6 where we do not pass any IPv6 traffic in the
system as part of our compliance suite at this time.
2) Do we intend to document the inherited test cases for RefStack? If not, and
we are not curating those tests in any way ourselves, maybe we should pull them
out as explicit tests cases and refer instead to the RefStack documentation and
infer that we expect RefStack to be passed on an OPNFV deployed system as a
pre-requisite.
We need a clear way of handling those test cases, either we curate them
ourselves or we have a clear agreement with the OpenStack interop WG on how we
leverage that suite. At this time we list an own curated version but provide
no documentation of the test cases, why they were selected and the procedure
for selection.
Cheers,
Chris
On 2017-06-23, 11:50, "Tim Irnich" <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Dave, all,
Sorry for misunderstanding your point. In that case, is there any other
feedback from other TSC members on the proposal?
Tapio & Ray, I think we should reserve some time in next week's TSC to go
over the suggested test scope (both mandatory and optional parts) for Danube
compliance testing once more so that the Dovetail team can be confident about
focusing on the right things.
Regards, Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Neary [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 01:53
To: Tim Irnich <[email protected]>; Wenjing Chu
<[email protected]>; Christopher Price <[email protected]>;
Tianhongbo <[email protected]>; Tallgren, Tapio
<[email protected]>; Georg Kunz <[email protected]>
Cc: TSC OPNFV <[email protected]>; TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] [dovetail] TSC and DoveTail
meeting to discuss scope and needs for CVP testing
Hi Tim,
On 06/20/2017 09:02 PM, Tim Irnich wrote:
>> I would like to see us document some of the NFV related requirements
>> which are common across all RFCs from telcos, and which are available
>> in all viable VIM products.
>
> This is exactly the intention of the proposal, under the side
> constraint of drawing from already existing tests. The question to the
> TSC was if this is enough for an initial release. I think your answer is
no.
On the contrary - the initial release scope is fine, my comment was on the
"future plans" piece.
Thanks,
Dave.
--
Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy
Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338
_______________________________________________
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
