Wenjuan,
Please go ahead! Thanks, Ryota From: dong.wenj...@zte.com.cn [mailto:dong.wenj...@zte.com.cn] Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 7:46 PM To: Mibu Ryota(壬生 亮太) <r-m...@cq.jp.nec.com> Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: 答复: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [doctor] zte-virtual3(apex) zte-virtual4(fuel) Hi, As I mentioned in the previous email, I would like to tag zte pod and ool pod with the same label. What do you think? Let me know if you have some ideas. Thanks~ BR, dwj 原始邮件 发件人：董文娟00101742 收件人： <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>; 日 期 ：2017年06月22日 17:41 主 题 ：[opnfv-tech-discuss] [doctor] zte-virtual3(apex) zte-virtual4(fuel) Hi All, I deployed zte-virtual3 with apex Danube2.0 and zte-virtual4 with fuel Danube2.0. Now these two pods are online[1]. I also updated the pods info in the etherpad[2] How about tagging ool-virtual1 and zte-virtual3 with the same label: doctor-apex-verify, and ool-virtual2 and zte-virtual4 with the same label: doctor-fuel-verify? Then we can check whether the verify jobs can be built on any of the Pods with the label. [1]. https://build.opnfv.org/ci/ [2]. https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/doctor_ci_pod BR, dwj
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
