+1.

No preference. 



On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 07:02:07AM +0000, Ulrich Kleber wrote:
> +1
> 
> no preference
> 
>  
> 
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Fatih
> Degirmenci
> Sent: Wednesday, 21 June, 2017 08:39
> To: Raymond Paik
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] TSC vote requested for security fix
> 
>  
> 
> +1
> 
> No preference.
> 
> /Fatih
> 
> 
> On 21 Jun 2017, at 08:28, <[email protected]> <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> 
> +1
> no preference
> 
> Morgan
> 
> On 21/06/2017 06:54, Stuart Mackie wrote:
> 
>     +1 - Either
> 
>      
> 
>     Stuart
> 
>     -914 886 2534
> 
>      
> 
>     From: <[email protected]> on behalf of Raymond
>     Paik <[email protected]>
>     Date: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 at 3:07 PM
>     To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>     Cc: "[email protected]"
>     <[email protected]>
>     Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] TSC vote requested for security fix
> 
>      
> 
>     OPNFV TSC Members:
> 
>      
> 
>     Sorry for the short notice, but earlier today the Linux Foundation IT team
>     has been made aware of a high priority security issue (see https://
>     access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabilities/stackguard) and need to apply
>     package errata and perform systems reboot as soon as possible.  We
>     tentatively scheduled 1-hour window on June 24th @01:00 - 02:00 UTC for
>     this work, but if the TSC agrees, we'd like fix this sooner.  
> 
>      
> 
>     I realize the timing is not ideal as people are working on Danube 3.0, but
>     two options I'd like to propose are 22:00 - 23:00 UTC on June 21st or June
>     22nd.  
> 
>      
> 
>     Could I ask the TSC members to send your votes on the following as soon as
>     possible?
> 
>     ·         Do you approve an earlier security fix window? (Y/N)
> 
>     ·         If you answered Y above, are you OK with June 21st, June 22nd, 
> or
>     are you OK with either?
> 
>     Thanks, 
> 
>      
> 
>     Ray
> 
>      
> 
>      
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     _______________________________________________
> 
>     opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> 
>     [email protected]
> 
>     https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
> 
>  
> 
> --
> 
> Morgan Richomme
> 
> Orange/ IMT/ OLN/ CNC/ NCA/ SINA
> 
>  
> 
> Network architect for innovative services
> 
> Future of the Network community member
> 
> Open source Orange community manager
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> tel. +33 (0) 296 072 106
> 
> mob. +33 (0) 637 753 326
> 
> [email protected]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> 
>  
> 
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> 
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu 
> ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> 
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> 
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
> falsifie. Merci.
> 
>  
> 
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
> information that may be protected by law;
> 
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> 
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
> this message and its attachments.
> 
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
> modified, changed or falsified.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
> 

> _______________________________________________
> opnfv-tsc mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tsc

_______________________________________________
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Reply via email to