I am all in favour. It may also make sense to connect with the ETSI TST group - perhaps in a separate meeting - to get their point of view too.
Thanks, Dave. On 05/18/2017 07:04 PM, Cooper, Trevor wrote: > +1 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Georg Kunz [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 2:38 PM > To: Dave Neary <[email protected]>; Cooper, Trevor <[email protected]>; > Wenjing Chu <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Cc: Tianhongbo <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Fu Qiao > <[email protected]>; Leo Wang <[email protected]>; 'Lincoln Lavoie' > <[email protected]>; Jose Lausuch <[email protected]> > Subject: [dovetail] proposal: information sharing with OpenStack RefStack and > Interop people > > Hi all, > > We are trying very hard to establish processes, guidelines and best practices > for running the OPNFV certification program - on our own and with guidance > from C&C. I believe we can much better leverage existing knowledge and > experience from related communities. In this context, I'd like to make a > proposal. > > As mentioned during last week's call, Jose and I had very insightful > conversations with the relevant folks from the OpenStack certification > domain: Catherine Diep (RefStack PTL), Egle Sigler (co-chair Interop working > group) and Mark Voelker (co-chair Interop working group). We have developed a > good relationship with them and they are willing and interested in sharing > their experience in running the OpenStack certification / interop program > with us. > > My proposal: I'd like to invite the aforementioned persons to one or two of > our project meetings and let them share their experience, best practices and > guidelines with us. Based on these insights, we can then define, adapt and > optimize our own processes to suite our needs. The latter is important - I > don't think we can simply adopt their existing processes, but we should learn > about why existing processes in the OpenStack domain have evolved to their > current form. The OpenStack certification program was started in 2013 and > officially launched in 2015 - so there was serious effort and time involved. > We should try to build upon existing knowledge without having to go through > the same learning phase as the OpenStack folks. > > This requires some thoughtful timing, of course: In the very short term > future, we need to focus on finalizing the first iteration of the OPNFV > certification program. My proposal is not intending to undermine this. On the > contrary. However, the earlier we get additional insight, the better we can > define our own processes. > > I don't want to put this on the agenda for tomorrow's meeting (for obvious > reasons), but instead discuss this by email. > > @Wenjing / Hongbo: can we dedicate a future meeting to such a sharing session > with the OpenStack folks? > > Best regards > Georg > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Dave Neary [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 9:54 PM >> To: Cooper, Trevor <[email protected]>; Wenjing Chu >> <[email protected]>; [email protected] >> Cc: Tianhongbo <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Fu >> Qiao <[email protected]>; Leo Wang <[email protected]>; >> 'Lincoln Lavoie' <[email protected]>; Georg Kunz >> <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [dovetail] Weekly meeting agenda for May 19 >> >> Hi, >> >> My suspicion is that the entire meeting will be taken up with agenda items 2 >> and 3 from Wenjing. >> >> We need alignment around the test areas, and test case review. We also >> need to clarify what, if anything, we need to get in terms of guidance from >> C&C. I suggest inverting these agenda items, because the second will take >> less time than the first. >> >> Thanks, >> Dave. >> On 05/18/2017 02:38 PM, Cooper, Trevor wrote: >>> I would like to propose some topics ... a few minutes for each should be >>> fine to decide if we can defer or need a decision >>> >>> >>> >>> - H/w resources for Dovetail >>> >>> - Dovetail artifact versions and release schemes >>> >>> - Test catalog domains relevant to compliance >>> >>> - Stability test criteria >>> >>> >>> >>> /Trevor >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Wenjing Chu [mailto:[email protected]] >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 17, 2017 4:14 PM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Cc:* Dave Neary <[email protected]>; Tianhongbo >>> <[email protected]>; Cooper, Trevor >>> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Fu Qiao >>> <[email protected]>; Leo Wang <[email protected]>; >> 'Lincoln >>> Lavoie' <[email protected]>; Georg Kunz <[email protected]> >>> *Subject:* [dovetail] Weekly meeting agenda for May 19 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Please comment if the following agenda makes sense: >>> >>> >>> >>> 1. Welcome new committers and where we need immediate new >>> contribution and attention >>> >>> 2. Preparation for tsc review on 5/30 >>> >>> 3. Ask - what we need to ask from c&c and board? How should we >>> take on the administrative side of tasks. Also the Danube addendum for >> 5/22. >>> >>> 4. Naming convention of test cases >>> >>> 5. Vendor lab testing - needs volunteers to sign up beta testers >>> >>> 6. Tagging / releases, offline support >>> >>> 7. Design summit topics >>> >>> 8. Next week: can we still meet at the same time on 5/26 close to >>> memorial day weekend in US? >>> >>> >>> >>> We won't have enough time to cover all the topics in the meeting to >>> the full extent, but I'm hoping that we will have volunteers who can >>> take on some of the tasks and make progress. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> Wenjing >>> >> >> -- >> Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy >> Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com >> Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338 -- Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338 _______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
