I think we should look at the alignment and synergies with other existing OPNFV projects like yardstick since I believe the capability of those framework could be reused here. Let us discuss in the TSC call.
Regards Kannan Babu From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Frank Brockners (fbrockne) Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:10 PM To: TSC OPNFV <opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org>; TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cc: Carsten Rossenhoevel <cr...@eantc.de>; Alec Hothan (ahothan) <ahot...@cisco.com> Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] New project proposal: NFVbench Hi OPNFV, over the past few weeks we've distilled a proposals to create a toolkit to allow for black-box performance testing of NFVI with a network focus: NFVbench: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/nfvbench/NFVbench+Project+Proposal The NFVbench project is to develop a toolkit that allows developers, integrators, testers and customers to measure and assess the L2/L3 forwarding performance of an NFV-infrastructure solution stack (i.e. OPNFV scenario) using a black-box approach. We're hoping for a discussion in the technical community meeting on April/20, and are also asking for an official TSC review post the technical community review on May/2, so that NFVbench can participate in Euphrates. Consequently, NFVbench asks for tentative inclusion into Euphrates. Your thoughts and ideas are greatly appreciated. Thanks much, Frank, Carsten, Alec
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
