> Former committers removed for reasons other than being disruptive may be listed as ‘*Emeritus Committers*’. That title expresses gratitude for their service, but conveys none of the privileges of being a Committer.
I like this title *Emeritus Committers.* On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 6:11 AM Raymond Paik <rp...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > All, > > Following up on an earlier discussion on the TSC call. First, changes to > the TSC Charter do require a Board approval. We did this about two years > ago for a minor wording change. Once the TSC agrees on the new text, the > TSC Chair can present to the Board for a vote. > > Secondly, I looked at TSC charters of several LF projects on committer > removal and I think I found a good example from fd.io ( > https://fd.io/governance/technical-community-charter#3_2_2_2) which is > pretty much in line with what we discussed during the call. Basically, a > PTL can remove disruptive/inactive committers, but the PTL needs to notify > the TSC. > > I created a wiki page with a proposed text for the OPNFV TSC charter > update at https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/SKETCH/TSC+Charter+discussion > > Please let me know if you have any suggestions/question on the proposed > text by either replying to this email or commenting on the wiki page > > Finally, to close on the discussion on inactive committers report that > Aric generated. I'll be forwarding the list of inactive committers to PTLs > and I'll leave it up to the PTLs to have conversations with inactive > committers. Going forward, the inactive committers list will be generated > every ~6 months. > > Thanks, > > Ray > _______________________________________________ > opnfv-tsc mailing list > opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org > https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tsc > -- Yujun Zhang
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
