Hi Hongbo, I’m unfortunately not able to join this week’s call, would we be able to shift this one week? Alternatively, we could maybe have some discussion in the SDNVPN weekly meeting on Monday?
Regards, Tim From: Tianhongbo [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 03:02 To: Jose Lausuch <[email protected]>; Tim Irnich <[email protected]> Cc: Christopher Price <[email protected]>; TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <[email protected]>; Dave Neary <[email protected]> Subject: reply: [dovetail]if the l3vpn feature is completed fully in C release Hi Jose and Tim: Thanks Can I invite you two to join the next dovetail meeting for brief introduction? Best regards hongbo 发件人: Jose Lausuch [mailto:[email protected]] 发送时间: 2017年1月17日 20:34 收件人: Tianhongbo; Tim Irnich 抄送: Christopher Price; TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV; Dave Neary 主题: Re: [dovetail]if the l3vpn feature is completed fully in C release Hi, Adding Tim who is the PTL of the SDNVPN project. We had a discussion yesterday about it during the weekly team meeting. We would like to remark that the test cases were mature and gave success in Colorado release. However, there were some performance penalties in ODL when activating the bgpvpn plugin in Fuel. When doing so, some other test cases took longer execution time than in non-bgpvpn scenarios. This is being addressed for Danube. Apart from that, the test cases were stable enough to be considered as part of Dovetail test plan. Regards, Jose On 17 Jan 2017, at 03:33, Tianhongbo <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Jose and Chris: Could you please help me to check this action item? Best regards hongbo 发件人: Tianhongbo 发送时间: 2017年1月14日 15:32 收件人: Jose Lausuch 抄送: 'TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV' 主题: [dovetail]if the l3vpn feature is completed fully in C release Hi Jose: Last dovetail weekly meeting, we have reviewed dovetail test cases and requirements Here is the action item from the last dovetail weekly meeting: Vpn or l3vpn: unclear if the l3vpn feature is completed fully in C release (action: to collect definitive answer for next review). Commented that it should be excluded on the ground of not yet mature and have adoption (see test case reqs & cvp description). Could you please help to get the feedback to the dovetail for the next review? The minutes is attached by the end for email. Best regards hongbo
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
