Hi Hongbo, Jose,

As I was saying on the Dovetail calls, I have some concerns about moving
tests into the Dovetail test suite too early.

In the Dovetail test requirements, we have:

"* Test cases must pass on OPNFV reference deployments
  * Tests must not require a specific NFVi platform composition or
installation tool
  * Tests must not require unmerged patches to the relevant upstream
projects"

And in the CVP requirements, we have the following section:

"The overall CVP compliance verification scope tied to an OPNFV release
is determined by the Committee. The OPNFV TSC defines and maintains the
compliance verification procedures and associated tools. The scope is
constrained to features, capabilities, components, and interfaces
included in an OPNFV release that are generally available in the
industry (e.g., through adoption by an upstream community)."


I wonder if this functionality is sufficiently widely adopted in
commercial NFVi and VIM solutions to pass this bar.

Thanks,
Dave.

On 01/14/2017 02:32 AM, Tianhongbo wrote:
> Hi Jose:
> 
>  
> 
> Last dovetail weekly meeting, we have reviewed dovetail test cases and
> requirements
> 
>  
> 
> Here is the action item from the last dovetail weekly meeting:
> 
>  
> 
> Vpn or l3vpn: unclear if the l3vpn feature is completed fully in C
> release (action: to collect definitive answer for next review).
> Commented that it should be excluded on the ground of not yet mature and
> have adoption (see test case reqs & cvp description).
> 
>  
> 
> Could you please help to get the feedback to the dovetail for the next
> review?
> 
> The minutes is attached by the end for email.
> 
>  
> 
> Best regards
> 
>  
> 
> hongbo
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
> 

-- 
Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy
Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338
_______________________________________________
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Reply via email to