Hi Yujun, To my knowledge, the Draft Testperf Ecosystem Diagram was discussed and published at the first plugfest. Its orientation is to avoid overlap works between our testing projects and also to reflect the relations. Then after a lot of discussion within the community which leads to common consensus, the Diagram was updated during the OPNFV Berlin Summit (please refer to the presentation "Conversation with the Testing community"[1]). Now, the Updated Diagram has been published in WIKI page for 6 months and perceived stable community-wide. I believe if some modifications of the Diagram are expected, we should discuss first, then we do the changes. After all, we are working as a community. In addition, since any change to the Diagram may result in different relations between our testing projects, direct changes to the original Diagram will make things more complicated. It's better to have our discussion based on the summit version of our Testperf Ecosystem Diagram for changes. I'd like to work together with you to improve the modification process and keeping things in order. For this purpose, I would like help add a topic in the Testperf Weekly Meeting. I believe we can make further progress together! [1] https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/gitweb?p=functest.git;a=blob;f=docs/com/img/OPNFV_testing_group.png;h=4b8c2c053e0143b1a9abc7e54fd9e7671ccfcee8;hb=HEAD Thanks, Kubi
发件人: Yujun Zhang [mailto:zhangyujun+...@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2016年12月16日 16:43 收件人: Gaoliang (kubi); test-wg 抄送: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV; Morgan Richomme (morgan.richo...@orange.com); Jose Lausuch; trevor.coo...@intel.com; mark.bei...@emc.com; Yuyang (Gabriel) 主题: Re: [test-wg] [all] TestPerf EcoSystem diagram now editable See my replies inline. On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 3:43 PM Gaoliang (kubi) <jean.gaoli...@huawei.com<mailto:jean.gaoli...@huawei.com>> wrote: Hi Yujun, Thanks for your timely reply! First, it is a very praiseworthy effort of you on making the diagram editable! What I concerned is the process of the modification of the Testperf Ecosystem Diagram. As you know, Testperf Ecosystem Diagram is not only to show what the one project will do , but also the relationship between each projects. It is on the Testing Work Group Home Page and shows the consensus to the whole community. Another important function of this diagram is that It could help the test projects to avoid overlap. We shouldn’t modify the Ecosystem Diagram before consensus. Otherwise it may delivers misleading information to the whole community. I suggest to discuss the modification process of our Testperf Ecosystem Diagram in our testperf weekly meeting. Before the discussion taking place, we’d better go back to the structure[1] of ecosystem on which we have consensus and keep it editable. Currently, what is in my mind about the process is that maybe a proposal first, then we could discuss together and decide how to make the modification. [1] https://wiki.opnfv.org/download/attachments/2926690/OPNFV_testing_group.png?version=1&modificationDate=1467636653000&api=v2 Regards, Kubi This is exactly my motivation of the modification. I hope we can find out the original agreement so we can know why it is delivering a misleading message and we can work together to improve the process to keep things in order.
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
