I see. Thanks for clarification. On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 12:37 AM Ryota Mibu <r-m...@cq.jp.nec.com> wrote:
> Yujun, > > > Well, we don't have much new features in Danube. We need documentation and > testing improvements in Danube. Those are not easy to be mapped in an > overview picture. > > We wrote down the release plan while we didn't have JIRA and guidelines at > the early stage of OPNFV. The original plan and figure could be kept, but I > prefer to update that part with what we requires currently and move the > overview of old releases into an appendix for archive. > > > BR, > Ryota > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Yujun Zhang [mailto:zhangyujun+...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 3:59 PM > > To: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> > > Cc: Mibu Ryota(壬生 亮太) <r-m...@cq.jp.nec.com> > > Subject: ##freemail## [doctor] Danube plan overview > > > > Hi doctors, > > > > I'm reviewing the requirement document for an internal presentation. > There is a release plan for Arno and it looks > > good[1]. > > > > We have already sorted out the working items for Danube release, but it > would be better if we can have an overview > > about the goals we want to achieve. > > > > @Ryota, what do you think? > > > > [1]: > http://artifacts.opnfv.org/doctor/docs/requirements/index.html#implementation-plan-for-opnfv-release-1 > > [2]: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/doctor/Danube+Planning >
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
