Hi Billy,

Just a reminder that we also have the Colorado 2.0 daily (M, Th, Fri) which
Sofia often attends, if you have questions.  This is IRC only on channel
opnfv-release.

David

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 6:56 AM, O Mahony, Billy <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Sofia,
>
> I am standing in for Mark Gray as OVSNFV PTL while he is on vacation.
>
> We are not making any documentation changes for colorado2.0.
>
> Can you clarify the actions I need to take regarding to the doc updates
> for Colorado2.0 as the link as the advice below seems to be in conflict.
>
> - Do I need to update all references/links in my documentation that reads
> ' colorado/docs' to 'colorado/2.0/docs' ?
> - Do I check these git patches in to master?
> - Do I then cherry-pick these changes to Colorado?
> - Do I need to tag Colorado branch with Colorado2.0? When is this to be
> done?
> - What does step 4. 'Re-merge' mean?
> - Anything else?
>
> Thanks,
> Billy.
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:opnfv-tech-
> > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Aric Gardner
> > Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 2:47 PM
> > To: Sofia Wallin <[email protected]>
> > Cc: [email protected]; TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV (opnfv-tech-
> > [email protected]) <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [opnfvdocs]
> > Documentation updates for Colorado 2.0
> >
> > Quick edit,
> >
> > > 2, Cherrypick to Colorado 2.0
> >
> > is just Cherrypick to Colorado
> >
> > The remerge is what does the work, as all documentation merged after the
> > colorado release will be put in the 2.0 folder.
> >
> > -Aric
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Sofia Wallin <[email protected]
> >
> > wrote:
> > > Thank you Jonas for clarifying!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > All project must re-merge their documentation so that it gets updated
> > > to Colorado.2.0.
> > >
> > > http://artifacts.opnfv.org/opnfvdocs/colorado/2.0/docs/documentation/i
> > > ndex.html
> > >
> > > No matter if any updates has been made or not.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > How to do it,
> > >
> > > 1, Do your editorial updates and/or link updates
> > >
> > > 2, Cherrypick to Colorado 2.0
> > >
> > > 3, Tag according to tagging procedure
> > >
> > > 4, Re-merge
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > BR,
> > >
> > > Sofia
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Jonas Bjurel
> > > Sent: den 11 oktober 2016 23:21
> > > To: Sofia Wallin <[email protected]>;
> > > [email protected]; TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV
> > > ([email protected])
> > > <[email protected]>;
> > > Fatih Degirmenci <[email protected]>; Ryota
> > > <[email protected]>; David McBride
> > <[email protected]>;
> > > Christopher Price <[email protected]>
> > > Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [opnfvdocs]
> > > Documentation updates for Colorado 2.0
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Adding to Sofia’s point, please be aware that any documentation built
> > > for the Colorado 2.0 release will end up in a different OPNFV
> > > artifacts name-space. This means that links have to be reviewed and
> > verified.
> > >
> > > And in many case this means a complete new docs set for the projects –
> > > as the name-space change propagates through all links.
> > >
> > > BR/Jonas
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: [email protected]
> > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sofia
> > > Wallin
> > > Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 4:46 PM
> > > To: [email protected]; TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV
> > > ([email protected])
> > > <[email protected]>
> > > Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [opnfvdocs]
> > > Documentation updates for Colorado 2.0
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Please note that if any documentation has been updated for Colorado
> > > 2.0 links in the OPNFV overall documents might need to be updated as
> > well.
> > >
> > > Let me know what updates that has been done and/or if you plan to do
> > > any updates.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > BR,
> > >
> > > Sofia
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: [email protected]
> > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> > > Sofia Wallin
> > > Sent: den 6 oktober 2016 14:16
> > > To: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV ([email protected])
> > > <[email protected]>;
> > > [email protected]
> > > Subject: [opnfv-project-leads] [opnfvdocs] [opnfv-tech-discuss]
> > > Version control for generated documents
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > In order to preserve the documents released as part of colorado.1.0,
> > > the location to store colorado.2.0 documents have been changed.
> > >
> > > The new location adds version string into the path. For example, the
> > > top level colorado.1.0 release documentation was stored and linked as
> > below.
> > >
> > > http://artifacts.opnfv.org/opnfvdocs/colorado/docs/documentation/index
> > > .html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > This now changed to for any updates that might come for this document.
> > >
> > > http://artifacts.opnfv.org/opnfvdocs/colorado/2.0/docs/documentation/i
> > > ndex.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > If you plan to do documentation updates as part of colorado.2.0, you
> > > should update the links/references  in them accordingly.
> > >
> > > This is a step towards applying version control for our generated
> > > documents and same change will be applied for colorado.3.0 as well.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Let me know if you have any questions.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > BR,
> > >
> > > Sofia
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
>



-- 
*David McBride*
Release Manager, OPNFV
Mobile: +1.805.276.8018
Email/Google Talk: [email protected]
Skype: davidjmcbride1
IRC: dmcbride
_______________________________________________
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Reply via email to