Hi Dave Were you trying to reply to the dovetail agenda email or the minutes email?
In either case, the topic of finalizing test case criteria was listed. In last week's call, because of low attendance, we didn't take on any meaty subject, and focused on reviewing what we needed improvement around the wiki and meeting logistics etc. but the subject of finalizing the test case criteria (was noted down in the minutes by me as "test case requirement", sorry for swapping the terms, will correct it.) did come up as we were looking over that wiki page. I suggest we spend a few minutes to recap of what was discussed last week as we review the minutes. Regards Wenjing -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dave Neary Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 9:45 AM To: Tianhongbo <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Chris Price <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]dovetail weekly meeting minutes 9/30 Apologies - replied to the wrong meeting minutes email. The email I replied to was where this task was documented as a priority work item. Thanks, Dave. On 10/11/2016 12:44 PM, Dave Neary wrote: > Hello Hongbo, > > I see that Chris and myself were both absent last week. For my part, I > was at an event and had difficulties joining. > > I also notice that one item outstanding from the previous week was not > discussed, and I would like to make progress on that issue this week. > > We agree that we should finalize the test criteria for Dovetail, and > that we should do this as soon as possible, before we have added too > many test cases to the Dovetail test suite. > > Looking at the draft document: > https://wiki.opnfv.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=6827269 > it seems to me that there are a number of areas where we need > discussion and agreement. > > 1. Requirement that all patches be submitted upstream - there was some > discussion on this point when it was proposed, we should ensure that > we have agreement 2. Requirement that tests pass on multiple scenarios > in OPNFV test infrastructure - You have expressed concerns that this > is difficult because of multiple SDN controllers 3. Required > documentation for test cases - we currently do not have test cases > which satisfy all of the documentation requirements - or the requested > requirement from the C&C committee that the test case should be > sufficiently well described to allow manual execution 4. "Out of > scope" - Chris has stated that this section should be removed from the > document, we should discuss and agree whether this is correct. > > Are there any other potential areas of disagreement? If there are, we > need to document them, and figure out how we converge on an agreed > document. This document can then be used to qualify proposed test > cases and verify that they fulfill the requirements. > > Thank you, > Dave. > > > > On 10/03/2016 09:08 PM, Tianhongbo wrote: >> Hi all: >> >> >> >> That is the dovetail weekly meeting minutes: >> >> >> >> >> >> 11:00:09 - collabot: Minutes: >> http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2016/opnf >> v-meeting.2016-09-30-14.00.html >> >> 11:00:09 - collabot: Minutes (text): >> http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2016/opnf >> v-meeting.2016-09-30-14.00.txt >> >> 11:00:09 - collabot: Log: >> http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2016/opnf >> v-meeting.2016-09-30-14.00.log.html >> >> >> >> Best regards >> >> >> >> hongbo >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss >> > -- Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338 _______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss _______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
