Sounds ok to me, but we need to ensure that project proposal discussions can take priority, and that we move them efficiently thru the process.
On Oct 10, 2016, at 3:19 AM, Margaret Chiosi <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Folks we will switch to every other week when there are technical topics to discuss. Bin doesn't think there are enough topics to run every other week. Basically polestar will take the week sessions which Bin's sessions doesn't use. On Monday, October 10, 2016, Christopher Price <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Folks, I think we may want to think a little loner on this. I tend to agree that we have overlap in interested parties between the tech-discuss calls and Polestar which is good and healthy, but I don’t see that they serve such a common purpose that we would cancel tech-discuss to schedule a polestar meeting. What happens if someone wants to review a project or technical contribution that week? I don’t think we should offset the only general purpose community call we have established. A longer term solution to this may be to find an alternative time for Polestar or accept that it may run in parallel to the community meetings. / Chris From: <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> on behalf of Margaret Chiosi <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> Date: Sunday, 9 October 2016 at 20:36 To: "HU, BIN" <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> Cc: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call 10/6/2016 Bin ok. Min let's cancel next Thursday. On Saturday, October 8, 2016, HU, BIN <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: Sure. I am very happy to have you have the following week (Oct 20). Because there is not many new project proposals or community issues to discuss now, essentially you may have most of weeks down the road. If there are new proposals or other community issues for discussion, I will let you and Min know and we may have alternate weeks. What do you think? Thanks Bin From: Margaret Chiosi [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2016 12:48 PM To: HU, BIN <[email protected]> Cc: Ulrich Kleber <[email protected]>; Raymond Paik <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call 10/6/2016 So when is your next call? also if you have one next week then can you let me have my polestar the following week? thanks On Oct 7, 2016, at 1:13 PM, HU, BIN <[email protected]> wrote: Thank you Margaret. Let’s coordinate in the future if many people intend to participate in both. Thanks Bin From: Margaret Chiosi [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, October 07, 2016 2:58 AM To: Ulrich Kleber <[email protected]> Cc: HU, BIN <[email protected]>; Raymond Paik <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call 10/6/2016 Sure we can cancel our call if there is the true hbical community call. Bin just needs to coordinate with me and min. On Friday, October 7, 2016, Ulrich Kleber <[email protected]> wrote: I think we should consider the overlap with the technical community call. It is not only about GTM accounts, but about people. There are several people who want to participate in both. Can we still solve this? (sorry, I forgot to raise it during the call due to the lively discussion on terminology and scope of “onboarding”) Cheers, Uli From: [email protected][mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of HU, BIN Sent: Thursday, 06 October, 2016 23:51 To: Raymond Paik Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call 10/6/2016 Sounds good, and thank you Ray Bin From: Raymond Paik [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2016 2:49 PM To: HU, BIN <[email protected]> Cc: Wenjing Chu <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call 10/6/2016 Bin, It's a separate one (username: [email protected]) from the project calls so there shouldn't be conflicts with the technical discussion meeting on Thursday. Thanks, Ray On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 2:43 PM, HU, BIN <[email protected]> wrote: Ray, What is the GTM account Polestar WG regularly uses? I see the time overlap with technical discussion on Oct 13. We use the initial GTM account in weekly technical discussion on Oct 13. Thanks Bin From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Raymond Paik Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2016 12:19 PM To: Wenjing Chu <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call 10/6/2016 All, Apologies for the inconvenience. We realized late last night that Polestar was using the same GTM account as the Board meeting and there's an overlap between Polestar & Board meeting. This won't be the case going forward... Thanks, Ray On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Wenjing Chu <[email protected]> wrote: Same disappointment for me. The wiki also incorrectly listed the meeting on Oct 5. I was left wondering whether I missed the meeting because of wrong date. I didn't think it could be because of wrong bridge. Wenjing -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Christopher Price Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2016 9:24 AM To: Dave Neary <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call 10/6/2016 I fated the same way as Dave. I would also like to see the times and bridges settled. Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 6, 2016, at 18:02, Dave Neary <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thank you Min, > > Unfortunately I was not online, and joined the incorrect bridge from > my phone. I am disappointed I missed another meeting. > > Can meeting details be confirmed a little further in advance for > future meetings? > > Regards, > Dave. > >> On 10/06/2016 08:54 AM, Min Yu wrote: >> All, >> >> Please use the bridge info below to join today's Polestar call. My >> apologies for the last minute change. >> >> OPNFV SPC Polestar WG Call >> >> Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone. >> https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/158053245 >> >> You can also dial in using your phone. >> United States (Toll-free) 1 877 309 2070<tel:1%20877%20309%202070> United >> States +1 (571) >> 317-3116 >> >> Access Code: 158-053-245 >> >> >> First GoToMeeting? Try a test >> session: http://help.citrix.com/getready >> <http://help.citrix.com/getready> >> -- >> Min Yu >> Client Services Coordinator >> The Linux Foundation >> +1(530) 902-6464<tel:%2B1%28530%29%20902-6464> (m) >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >> Skype: minyudecorah >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss > > -- > Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy Open Source and Standards, Red > Hat - http://community.redhat.com<http://community.redhat.com/> > Ph: +1-978-399-2182<tel:%2B1-978-399-2182> / Cell: > +1-978-799-3338<tel:%2B1-978-799-3338> > _______________________________________________ > opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss _______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss _______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss -- Margaret Chiosi -- Margaret Chiosi _______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss -- Margaret Chiosi _______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
