David, Several of the unplanned issues in FDS are Epics. When checking for unplanned issues, it might make sense to not count Epics because e.g. in FDS we don’t apply them to a single release (like Colorado 1.0).
Thanks, Frank From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David McBride Sent: Montag, 12. September 2016 22:32 To: [email protected]; TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <[email protected]> Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [release][jira] OPNFV JIRA status Team, See attachment for the latest OPNFV JIRA report. We still have 235 unresolved issues assigned to Colorado 1.0. Given that we are less than two weeks from the Colorado 1.0 release, these should be reassigned to future releases, unless you are confident that they will be resolved and closed this week. In addition, we still have 144 unplanned issues (i.e. issues not assigned to a release in the "fix version" field. Please continue to work to get these issue assigned to releases as soon as possible. Unplanned issues create ambiguity in understanding release status and for release planning. Thanks and let me know if you have questions. David -- David McBride Release Manager, OPNFV Mobile: +1.805.276.8018<tel:%2B1.805.276.8018> Email/Google Talk: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Skype: davidjmcbride1 IRC: dmcbride
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
