I'm in total agreement and am happy to follow your lead. I would just like to know too so that I can provide my input back into any of our resource teams. Trying to support you.
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Margaret Chiosi < [email protected]> wrote: > Ash that is fine. We just need to decide what gets worked with each WG. > > > On Friday, September 9, 2016, Ash <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Guys, >> >> That last bullet in the minutes is a little disconcerting. If there are >> in fact overlaps between MANO and Polestar WGs, it would be nice if they >> could be clarified with the whole list vs. just with Margaret. >> >> Sorry to be a pain. Just want to make sure we're all on the same page vs >> different ones. >> >> Best, >> >> Ash >> >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Min Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Attendees: Anthony Soong, Bryan Sullivan, Larry Lamers, Margaret Chiosi, >>> Michael Bugenhagen, Prakash Ramchandran, Steven Wright, Tapio Tallgren, >>> Yunjun Zhang, Min Yu >>> >>> - >>> >>> Meeting Minutes/Agenda Approval: Approved >>> - >>> >>> User Scenarios of Pain Points and Priorities by Steven >>> - >>> >>> Steven noted that expansions and comments have been added to the >>> Pain Points and a separate VNF Onboarding page >>> >>> <https://wiki.opnfv.org/pages/viewpage.action?spaceKey=EUAG&title=VNF+Onboarding+and+Deployment> >>> has been created on the EUAG’s wiki. >>> - >>> >>> A question was asked about the difference between “provider” and >>> “operator” and if they have different requirements. A discussion then >>> followed about the need to define these terms so the ecosystem >>> operates >>> from the same understanding. A suggestion was made that the Polestar >>> WG >>> could take this up as a future action item. >>> - >>> >>> In the VNF Options section, a question was raised regarding the >>> VNF Package being a “single binary object.” Steven noted that >>> replacing >>> “binary” with “executable” perhaps helps clarify the meaning. >>> - >>> >>> A question was asked to define the OPNFV community as an actor. >>> The attendees discussed whether this means OPNFV has a role to play in >>> hosting technical validation of platform capability that enables VNFs >>> rather than validating VNF packages in the market. A comment was made >>> that >>> if VNF onboarding is a feature in future OPNFV releases, OPNFV will >>> also >>> have a role in certifying that VNFs work with a particular release. >>> The >>> attendees generally agreed that it would be helpful for VNF vendors if >>> operators start to outline what the processes are going to be, even >>> though >>> some are more business-oriented and do not apply to the OPNFV system. >>> Such >>> outlines would inform the vendors of the expectations and scope. >>> - >>> >>> Margaret polled attendees’ plans to attend a F2F meeting at ODL >>> Summit in Seattle to further discuss this. She also mentioned there >>> was >>> some overlap between what the MANO WG and the Polestar WG are doing. >>> Bryan >>> confirmed there are some overlaps and will clarify them for Margaret >>> after >>> the call. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Min Yu >>> Client Services Coordinator >>> The Linux Foundation >>> +1(530) 902-6464 (m) >>> [email protected] >>> Skype: minyudecorah >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss >>> >>> >> > > -- > Margaret CHiosi > >
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
