Min add to the meeting minutes that I am looking for comments on the new
initiatives organization. If I don't here anything, then I will map the
projects to the new set

On Monday, August 22, 2016, Min Yu <[email protected]> wrote:

> Attendees: Anthony Soong, Chris Price, Heather Kirksey, Jonne Soininen,
> Larry Lamers, Margaret Chiosi, Shamil, Steven Furr, Steven Wright, Tapio
> Tallgren, Yujun Zhang, Min Yu
>
> Minutes
>
>    -
>
>    Previous Minutes/Agenda: approved
>
>
>    -
>
>    Meeting Schedule
>    -
>
>       The proposal to move the WG meeting to 6AM Pacific Time was
>       approved to accommodate people in Asia time zones. The GTM info remains 
> the
>       same.
>       -
>
>       Between now and the end of September, the WG will meet every
>       Thursday.
>       -
>
>    Use of Aha! Tool for Strategic Planning
>    -
>
>       Margaret gave an update that Cliff showed her some basics of the
>       Aha! Tool. Margaret is going to experiment and get comfortable using it
>       while the pricing and payment are being reconciled before the need to
>       expand user IDs is considered.
>       -
>
>    Discussion on Pain Points Clarification by Steven Wright
>    -
>
>       Steven Wright, newly elected Chair of the End User Advisory Group
>       (EUAG), noted that since EUAG has just formed, the group hasn’t had the
>       chance to add details and refinement to the pain points that Bryan 
> posted
>       on the wiki.
>       -
>
>       In response to Steven’s question about how EUAG and SPC Polestar WG
>       can collaborate, suggestions included EUAG providing Polestar WG with
>       guidance on the prioritization, sequencing, and precise use stories and
>       scenario(s) of the pain points. Action: Steven will create detailed
>       user stories of the pain points.
>       -
>
>       Steven asked about the release timeline of the next roadmap.
>       Margaret noted that OPNFV doesn’t yet have a strategic roadmap. The 
> plan is
>       to identify one or two key areas to focus on and then map the current 
> OPNFV
>       projects to see if there are enough projects addressing those areas by 
> the
>       end of September.  And it would be helpful if EUAG and Polestar WG
>       use the same format to organize and focus their efforts. Steven
>       cautioned that progress may be slow initially because EUAG is a new 
> group.
>       -
>
>       Questions were asked about the purpose of VNFs and Networking for
>       NFV. Steven will get some clarification on these two points with EUAG. 
> Action:
>       Steven will also identify main architecture components if end users have
>       strong opinions in this space.
>       -
>
>       The group decided to use the ODL Summit at the end of September as
>       a target date and to have a holistic discussion at the Summit amongst 
> the
>       EUAG members, Polestar WG members, and PTLs. Between now and then, EUAG
>       should identify 1-2 highest pain points, the Polestar WG work on mapping
>       the OPNFV projects to those pain points, and people in the technical
>       community on this call coalesce the right people into the ODL Summit
>       discussion.
>       -
>
>    Review of Margaret's Mapping
>    -
>
>       Because of the many overlaps between the initiatives identified by
>       the SPC and the EUAG's pain points, Margaret created Initiatives v2 (see
>       Exhibit A) and noted that it would help move things along if EUAG uses 
> the
>       same version when it does the prioritization.
>       -
>
>       Margaret showed the group her Excel mapping sheet (see Exhibit B)
>       and noted that it’s cumbersome to move things around and connect the 
> dots
>       on the Excel spreadsheet so she will move the information to Aha! once 
> she
>       gets the license.
>       -
>
>     AoB
>    -
>
>       Everyone welcomed Shamil, who was on the call today as the
>       interface with the Polestar WG from the OpenStack Product WG. A question
>       was asked about how to engage with the Product WG in providing OPNFV use
>       stories. Shamil commented that today’s discussion on refining paint 
> points,
>       user stories, and text scenarios are good next steps. Shamil will share 
> the
>       Product WG’s template on capturing use stories and recommended the 
> Polestar
>       WG to use a similar format. Shamil also agreed that they can combine
>       resources on both sides if Polestar and Product groups work together in
>       this area.
>       -
>
>       The Polestar WG will provide input to the SPC for approval before
>       the SPC’s report out to the Board on September 8.
>
> MeetBot Minutes: http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/
> opnfv-polestar/2016/opnfv-polestar.2016-08-18-15.05.html
>
> Exhibit A: 20160818 v2 Polestar WG
>
> Exhibit B: 20160818 OPNFV Projects
>
>
> Find Exhibit A and B on the Polestar wiki page: https://wiki.opnfv.org/
> display/polestar/Meetings
>
>
_______________________________________________
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Reply via email to