I support fewer distinct channels also. If it turns out we have an adhoc meeting conflict, we can setup #opnfv-alt1/2/3 ala OpenStack, ping others and move conversations there as needed. Just like CB radio.
On Aug 10, 2016, at 8:54 AM, Dave Neary <[email protected]> wrote: Hi, I agree with Chris. There is also a very well suited channel for general discussion, not limited to Dovetail, #opnfv - I propose we use that if there are topics that need real-time interaction. Also, please remember the old Apache dictum: "If it didn't happen on the mailing list, it didn't happen". Nowadays, we would probably extend that to "if it didn't happen on the mailing list, on Jira, on Gerrit, or in the wiki, it didn't happen, but you get the point - it's important that real-time discussions are brought back to an asynchronous, archived forum. Thanks, Dave. > On 08/10/2016 08:25 AM, Christopher Price wrote: > Ok, interesting no-one mentioned that on the last meeting. > > > > Can we discuss it as a group on Friday before changing what was agreed 5 > days ago? > > (Note: releng did create it’s own channel but no longer uses it, rather > they work on community channels as separate channels are at times not > very useful for collaborative activities.) > > > > / Chris > > > > > > *From: *Tianhongbo <[email protected]> > *Date: *Wednesday 10 August 2016 at 13:53 > *To: *Christopher Price <[email protected]>, Christopher Price > <[email protected]>, Dave Neary <[email protected]>, > TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <[email protected]> > *Subject: *答复: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]suggest to use the > #opnfv-dovetail for the dovetail meeting > > > > Hi Chris: > > > > Yes, we agreed to use the opnfv-meeting. > > But now, there is a requirements that all people like to talk in the IRC > all time for dovetail like done in the releng or yardstick. > > If we use opnfv-meeting, we cannot do that. > > That is the problem. > > > > Best Regards > > > > hongbo > > > > *发件人**:*Christopher Price [mailto:[email protected]] > *发送时间:* 2016年8月10日 18:34 > *收件人:* Tianhongbo; Christopher Price; Dave Neary; TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV > *主题:* Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]suggest to use the > #opnfv-dovetail for the dovetail meeting > > > > Hi Hongbo, > > > > If I recall, there were comments on the last meeting that people > preferred to use opnfv-meeting. I had not heard anyone speak to the > desire to create another IRC channel for this meeting series. > > > > My only thought is that it seems unnecessary to create another channel, > our committers indicated a desire to stay on opnfv-meeting and it is > unclear why this has come up again. > > > > / Chris > > > > *From: *<[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of > Tianhongbo <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > *Date: *Wednesday 10 August 2016 at 03:02 > *To: *Christopher Price <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>, Dave Neary <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>, TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > *Subject: *[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]suggest to use the > #opnfv-dovetail for the dovetail meeting > > > > Hi all: > > > > With the development of dovetail, there are more people involved in. > > we used the opnfv-meeting before. > > In order to help people to discuss whenever and wherever, I suggest to > use the #opnfv-dovetail for dovetail discussion. > > If we have dovetail own IRC, it can avoid the conflict. > > We tested it, it works. > > > > Any comments? > > > > Best Regards > > > > hongbo > > _______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss > mailing list [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss -- Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338 _______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss _______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
