Hi Billy, Thank you for your reply.
>I’ve given some summary above but to understand fully what the tests do you’ll >have to read the yardstick code. I checked the yardstick documents and the source codes of yardstick yaml files, and can understand which benchmark programs are executed briefly. > Afaik, those tests were chosen as the standard daily suite for the scenarios > deployed by Fuel. And defined in test suite opnfv_ericsson-pod1_daily.yaml I cannot find the above yaml file… Sorry where is it ? # I searched the follow link (https://git.opnfv.org/cgit/ovsnfv/tree/), but I cannot find it. > The Brahmaputra CI for ovsnfv scenarios has been discontinued - as it’s no > longer under development. The CI for the ovsnfv scenario for Colorado should > >be coming on line soon. In my understanding, the CI is the ovsnfv scenarios that describes the procedures of yardstick testcases. Am I wrong ? If there are the wrong points, please give me comments. Regards, Chunghan Lee ---------------------------------------------------------- Chunghan Lee Cloud Network Project. Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd. 4-1-1 Kamikodanaka, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa 211-8588, Japan E-mail： [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> ---------------------------------------------------------- From: O Mahony, Billy [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 8:00 PM To: Lee, Chunghan/李 忠翰; [email protected] Subject: RE: [ovsnfv] Some questions Hi Chunghang, Some answeres in-line below for you. Hope that helps, /Billy. From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lee, Chunghan Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 3:44 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [ovsnfv] Some questions Hi Mark and billy, I’d like to ask some unclear points in my understanding. Could you give me answer ? 1. I’d like to understand our micro benchmark results clearly. I found the Yardstick document from the follow link. (http://artifacts.opnfv.org/yardstick/brahmaputra/docs/yardstick/03-list-of-tcs.html) Is it correct ? Currently, test cases (TC001,2,8,9,10,12,37.39) are available only ? In my understanding, only 7 tests are passed only. [[BO'M]] There were only ever 7 yardstick test executed for the ovsnfv scenario which all pass TC002-Ping TC005-File i/o TC010-Mem read latency TC011-Packet delay variation TC012-Mem r/w TC014-CPU Speed TC037-pktgen Afaik, those tests were chosen as the standard daily suite for the scenarios deployed by Fuel. And defined in test suite opnfv_ericsson-pod1_daily.yaml I’ve given some summary above but to understand fully what the tests do you’ll have to read the yardstick code. 2. From logs (14:35:54 11th July 2016), there is our scenario. What is our scenario ? Could you give me a link or the information related to the scenario ? Sorry… I cannot understand the scenario. 3. Is it Our CI link (https://build.opnfv.org/ci/view/ovsnfv/) ? [[BO'M]] The Brahmaputra CI for ovsnfv scenarios has been discontinued - as it’s no longer under development. The CI for the ovsnfv scenario for Colorado should be coming on line soon. Regards, Chunghan Lee ---------------------------------------------------------- Chunghan Lee Cloud Network Project. Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd. 4-1-1 Kamikodanaka, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa 211-8588, Japan E-mail： [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> ----------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
