On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 10:48 AM Robert Marko <robima...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, 18 May 2025 at 19:46, Philip Prindeville > <philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On May 18, 2025, at 11:42 AM, Robert Marko <robima...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, 18 May 2025 at 19:40, Philip Prindeville via openwrt-devel > > > <openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org> wrote: > > >> > > >> The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows > > >> sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. > > >> > > >> To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped > > >> automatically by the mailing list software. > > >> > > >> > > >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > >> From: Philip Prindeville <philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com> > > >> To: Philip Prindeville via openwrt-devel > > >> <openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org> > > >> Cc: > > >> Bcc: > > >> Date: Sun, 18 May 2025 11:39:49 -0600 > > >> Subject: UCI changes breaking Strongswan > > >> The function uci_lookup() went away in UCI, and now Strongswan is broken > > >> (or at least the UCI plugin is). > > >> > > >> It’s not clear what the equivalent replacement logic should be, using > > >> uci_lookup_next() or uci_lookup_ptr(), etc. > > >> > > >> If one of the UCI maintainers could review and comment on: > > >> > > >> https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/25353 That PR probably works. Feel free to merge. > > > > > > Hi, > > > I pushed a fix making the UCI plugin depend on @BROKEN as its been > > > broken for like 9 years or so and OpenWrt > > > itself does not need it. > > > https://github.com/openwrt/packages/commit/a8c89a0c77b71c1699c57b7c6d70b034a271d678 > > > > > > So, it should now compile. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Robert > > > > > > Thanks for doing that. I’m thinking that it’s a relatively straightforward > > change to get it working again, if one of the UCI maintainers can give a > > couple of minutes of guidance. > > Its probably not worth to put any time into the Strongswan UCI plugin, > given that its been broken for so long as it relied on API that is > long gone > then probably nobody cares about it. > > Regards, > Robert > > > > > -Philip > > > > > > >> > > >> that would be really helpful. > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> > > >> -Philip > > >> > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> openwrt-devel mailing list > > >> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > > >> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > openwrt-devel mailing list > > > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > > > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
