Your biggest hurdle is probably this part: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3118#section-5.4
It would help for you to understand what actually happens today for this part. BTW: all implementations of SIP are proprietary ;) but it's not impossible to figure it out. On 2024-11-11 13:31, Kevin Vigouroux wrote: > Hi! > > I would have liked to add the authentication option in odhcpd. > > My network topology is constrained by my ISP. Indeed, I have to keep my ISP's > router in a subnet to be able to get VoIP (Unfortunately, their implementation > of the SIP protocol is proprietary. They don't want an open source solution). > > The DHCPv4/v6 client on my ISP's CPE controls their messages with the ISP's > DHCPv4/v6 server with the "Configuration Token" protocol (RFC 3118). odhcpd > uses > the RKAP protocol (RFC 8415) for its FORCERENEW (DHCPv4) and Reconfigure > (DHCPv6) messages. > > I'm not sure how to go on. I'm still inexperienced in programming and don't > know > many concepts. I started by reading the libubox (blob.c, blobmsg.c) and uci > (file.c, libuci.c, list.c...) sources. > > My ISP uses the Configuration Token protocol for Discover, Offer, Request, > Acknowledge messages (DHCPv4). odhcpd uses the RKAP protocol for FORCERENEW > messages (DHCPv4). I would have liked to do something simple, because I'm not > competent. There could be a problem of priority in how to select the right > protocol. I would have thought of using the Configuration Token protocol for > DORA messages alongside the RKAP protocol for FORCENEW messages. I don't know > if this is a good idea? > > To start with, I'd like to implement a solution for DHCPv4. > > Note: dnsmasq is not an alternative because I also want to use unbound. _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
