W dniu 29.03.2024 o 09:57, Robert Marko pisze:
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 at 18:03, Tomasz Maciej Nowak <tmn...@terefe.re> wrote:
>>
>> From: Tomasz Maciej Nowak <tmn...@gmail.com>
>>
>> Introduced WoL feature needs CRC16 support.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Maciej Nowak <tmn...@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  package/kernel/linux/modules/netdevices.mk | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/package/kernel/linux/modules/netdevices.mk 
>> b/package/kernel/linux/modules/netdevices.mk
>> index af1d8b485e00..724f35df74a2 100644
>> --- a/package/kernel/linux/modules/netdevices.mk
>> +++ b/package/kernel/linux/modules/netdevices.mk
>> @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ define KernelPackage/phy-smsc
>>     SUBMENU:=$(NETWORK_DEVICES_MENU)
>>     TITLE:=SMSC PHY driver
>>     KCONFIG:=CONFIG_SMSC_PHY
>> -   DEPENDS:=+kmod-libphy
>> +   DEPENDS:=+kmod-libphy +!LINUX_5_15||!LINUX_6_1:kmod-lib-crc16
> I would prefer depending on 6.6 for the kmod, not the other way around.

I do prefer this version, otherwise if new major version is introduced and we
still will have three kernel versions, like at the moment, someone adding 
support
for it would need to add it to dependency list of this module. This would
naturally increase diffstat meaning more lines to review, while in this variant
other kernel version should naturally go away when it's dropped.

Nonetheless, v2 sent.
 
> 
> Regards,
> Robert

Regards

-- 
TMN


_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to