From: Tomasz Maciej Nowak <tmn...@gmail.com> Because some still unresolved bugs in this driver, which sprout occasional questions what this patch works around, point to the issue which started this. Being here, fill headers required by git am.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Maciej Nowak <tmn...@gmail.com> --- v1 -> v2 - rebase .../mvebu/patches-6.1/700-mvneta-tx-queue-workaround.patch | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/target/linux/mvebu/patches-6.1/700-mvneta-tx-queue-workaround.patch b/target/linux/mvebu/patches-6.1/700-mvneta-tx-queue-workaround.patch index 918132e2936c..14f93592fe3a 100644 --- a/target/linux/mvebu/patches-6.1/700-mvneta-tx-queue-workaround.patch +++ b/target/linux/mvebu/patches-6.1/700-mvneta-tx-queue-workaround.patch @@ -1,3 +1,6 @@ +From: Felix Fietkau <n...@nbd.name> +Subject: mvneta: tx queue workaround + The hardware queue scheduling is apparently configured with fixed priorities, which creates a nasty fairness issue where traffic from one CPU can starve traffic from all other CPUs. @@ -5,6 +8,8 @@ CPU can starve traffic from all other CPUs. Work around this issue by forcing all tx packets to go through one CPU, until this issue is fixed properly. +Ref: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/issues/5411 + Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <n...@nbd.name> --- --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c -- 2.44.0 _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel