The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.
--- Begin Message ---Hi, I'm new to openwrt and recently I have submitted github pull request to openwrt/packages repository. Unfortunately I was refused to contribute under my usual nickname due to real-name-only rule. And it seems I'm not the only one who faced this problem ([1], [2], [3], [4]), so I decided to ask for clarifications here. [1]: https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/17993#issuecomment-1059783673 [2]: https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/20312#issuecomment-1601308511 [3]: https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/22060#issuecomment-1751717855 [4]: https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/20540#issuecomment-1443679327 The aforementioned rule is listed on [submitting-patches] page in openwrt wiki: [submitting-patches]: https://openwrt.org/submitting-patches > ## Submissions should follow the following guidelines: > > ... > > * **all commits must contain `Signed-off-by: My Name <my@email.address>` > where you write your real name and real email address**, in accordance with > [Section 11 of the Linux Kernel patches guide] > > ... [Section 11 of the Linux Kernel patches guide]: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=HEAD#n416 I believe that the explicit requirement of real name isn't up to date with the upstream and doesn't reflect the original intent of the [Section 11 of the Linux Kernel patches guide] which was clarified by Linus in February 2023. See the [linux kernel commit] description and changes. [linux kernel commit]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=d4563201f33a022fc0353033d9dfeb1606a88330 tldr; Linux now accepts known identities for contributions and does not require real names anymore. (Taken from [Jan-Niklas's mail].) This issue had been already mentioned in [Jan-Niklas's mail] and [Petr's mail] via openwrt-adm mailing list, but no action to update openwrt wiki had been taken since. [Jan-Niklas's mail]: https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-adm/2023-February/002358.html [Petr's mail]: https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-adm/2023-February/002364.html I'd like to ask openwrt core developers to revisit the aforementioned rule as it has been proven to cause misunderstanding in the community. With best regards, one-d-wide
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
