> Le 10 août 2023 à 22:25, Philip Prindeville > <philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com> a écrit : > > > >> On Aug 10, 2023, at 11:49 AM, Torbjörn Jansson <torbj...@jansson.tech> wrote: >> >> On 2023-08-06 21:39, Philip Prindeville wrote: >>> I don't know... I have a Xeon D-1548 based 1U Supermicro server with a 4TB >>> NVMe stick that would make a decent file server/NAS... >>>> On Aug 6, 2023, at 11:46 AM, Paul D <newt...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Pretty sure not. I'm receptive to ZFS and have used it in a few projects. >>>> Openwrt tends to focus on (devices with) smaller flash drives. Other FS >>>> better suited to such env. >>>> >>>> No ZFS is in available software packages today, in any case. >>>> >>>> >>>> On 2023-08-06 00:53, Philip Prindeville wrote: >>>>> Has anyone tried to package ZFS (more correctly, OpenZFS) for OpenWRT? >>>>> Is there any interest in doing so? >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/openzfs/zfs >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> you could always run openwrt as a vm under a hypervisor, for example proxmox. >> then you can keep openwrt without any extra packages like zfs and create >> extra vms as needed, proxmox already supports zfs if im not mistaken. >> >> if your lucky with the iommu groups you might even be able to pass thru one >> or more physical network interfaces to the openwrt vm directly. > > > > I can't assume that the underlying hardware supports virtualization or does > so in a meaningful way. Some of the platforms I'm looking at are resource > lean. I threw out the Xeon-D as an example as my prototyping hardware, but > I'm not going to assume that everyone has comparable hardware.
ZFS is anything *but* resource lean, though. _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
