The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.

To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.
--- Begin Message ---
------- Original Message -------
On Thursday, May 18th, 2023 at 4:56 PM, Christian Lamparter 
<chunk...@gmail.com> wrote:


> On 4/21/23 10:59, Wojciech Dubowik via openwrt-devel wrote:
> 
> > The dafault location of tfa-layerscape has been changed from
> > codeuaurora to github. Also use the latest tag for Layerscape
> > Linux Development POC from NXP.
> > 
> > v2:
> > * restored ls1012afrdm board
> > * added platfrom defines to fiptool so ls-ddr-phy can be built
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Wojciech dubowikwojciech.dubo...@protonmail.ch
> 
> 
> hmm, source.codeaurora.org (no longer?) resolves. So yes, this
> needs to be updated.
> 
> I ran into issues applying this particular patch though.
> (PKG_RELEASE:=$(AUTORELEASE) has recently being canned, but this is easy to 
> fix)
> 
> what I'm scratching my head about are these:
> ---
> Checking file 
> package/boot/tfa-layerscape/patches/001-fiptool-hostbuild-fixes.patch
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 1 with fuzz 1.
> Hunk #4 FAILED at 39.
> Hunk #5 FAILED at 77.
> 2 out of 5 hunks FAILED
> checking file 
> package/boot/tfa-layerscape/patches/003-plat-nxp-tools-fix-create_pbl-and-byte_swap-host-bui.patch
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 26.
> 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED
> checking file 
> package/boot/tfa-layerscape/patches/004-plat-nxp-restore-ls1012afrdm-support.patch
> ---
> 
> could you have more local changes to:
> 001-fiptool-hostbuild-fixes.patch
> 003-plat-nxp-tools-fix-create_pbl-and-byte_swap-host-bui.patch
> ?
That's strange as I haven't ran into such issues. I have just rebased patches 
on latest master. I have already fixed PKG_RELEASE and I have also removed two 
ls1028ardb specific patches which are not needed with the new uboot version.

Changes are on the my github branch. Could you give it a try?
https://github.com/wodu/openwrt/tree/ls-firmware

Cheers,
Wojtek
> 
> which need to be part of this patch?
> (or does this depend on a previous patch, that needs to be applied first)?
> 
> Cheers,
> Christian


--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to