Hi Tim, Thanks for doing this. I suggest to have config_<kver> for each subtargs in the subtarget dirs..
I have sent the patches for adding the imx8 platform. But it can't be accepted due to the firmware issue. Basically the DDR firmware for im8x was released by a self-extracted binary. When extracted, customer need to accept the EULA which is not accepted by OpenWRT community. Have you solved this problem? BR, Andy > -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Harvey <thar...@gateworks.com> > Sent: 2023年3月4日 8:20 > To: OpenWrt Development List <openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org> > Cc: Piotr Dymacz <pep...@gmail.com>; Andy Tang <andy.t...@nxp.com> > Subject: [EXT] config_default vs subtargets having their own config_<ver>? > > Caution: EXT Email > > Greetings, > > I'm working on cortexa53 support for target/linux/imx for imx8 support and > am not quite clear how best to take care of kernel config. There is a lot of > differences in kernel config for > cortexa7/cortexa9/cortexa53 with regards to IMX SoC's. > > I see some targets have config_default files in the subtarget dirs and others > have config_<kver>. > > What is the recommended way of defining kernel config per subtarget and > how is it recommended to come up with those split up config files? > > Best Regards, > > Tim _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel