On Sat, 7 Jan 2023 at 16:26, Thibaut VARÈNE <vare...@zigoo.net> wrote: > > > > > Le 7 janv. 2023 à 15:06, Christian Marangi <ansuels...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 11:49:44PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote: > >> I need to express a per-target dependency on the 'base64' utility, and > >> that's seemingly impossible to do for busybox. Pull in coreutils to make > >> that easier. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpe...@gmail.com> > > > > We still need to think of a correct solution for this... coreutils is an > > option but wonder if a better one is openssl... Actually we have a small > > tool to handle specific decryption of some stuff... Wonder if that can > > be expanded for this task and just use wolfssl or openssl api to decode > > base64 stuff? > > Using one or the other would impose (i.e. (en)force) that SSL library on this > particular target. Do we want this, especially considering the ongoing > conversation about mbedTLS? > > Also pulling an entire SSL implementation just to decode base64 seems a tad > overkill too.
I agree on this one, forcing usage of OpenSSL isn't ideal, coreutils is a better option for sure. Regards, Robert > > HTH > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
