The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.

To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.
--- Begin Message ---
Hello Jan!

On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 23:06:15 +0200
Jan Hoffmann <[email protected]> wrote:

> This function currently prints three messages for every switch port at
> KERN_INFO level. This takes a considerable amount of time during bootup
> and can even trigger an external watchdog.
> 
> Replace these log messages by a single one at KERN_DEBUG level.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Hoffmann <[email protected]>
> ---
>  .../linux/realtek/files-5.10/drivers/net/dsa/rtl83xx/common.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/linux/realtek/files-5.10/drivers/net/dsa/rtl83xx/common.c 
> b/target/linux/realtek/files-5.10/drivers/net/dsa/rtl83xx/common.c
> index 2a60f61c9582..13e63a5f0c5d 100644
> --- a/target/linux/realtek/files-5.10/drivers/net/dsa/rtl83xx/common.c
> +++ b/target/linux/realtek/files-5.10/drivers/net/dsa/rtl83xx/common.c
> @@ -323,7 +323,6 @@ static int __init rtl83xx_mdio_probe(struct 
> rtl838x_switch_priv *priv)
>               if (of_property_read_u32(dn, "reg", &pn))
>                       continue;
>  
> -             pr_info("%s found port %d\n", __func__, pn);
>               phy_node = of_parse_phandle(dn, "phy-handle", 0);
>               if (!phy_node) {
>                       if (pn != priv->cpu_port)
> @@ -331,14 +330,13 @@ static int __init rtl83xx_mdio_probe(struct 
> rtl838x_switch_priv *priv)
>                       continue;
>               }
>  
> -             pr_info("%s port %d has phandle\n", __func__, pn);
>               if (of_property_read_u32(phy_node, "sds", 
> &priv->ports[pn].sds_num))
>                       priv->ports[pn].sds_num = -1;
>               else {
>                       pr_info("%s sds port %d is %d\n", __func__, pn,
>                               priv->ports[pn].sds_num);
>               }

The else block should probably get removed with your patch, because it prints 
redundant information only.

> -             pr_info("%s port %d has SDS\n", __func__, 
> priv->ports[pn].sds_num);
> +             pr_debug("%s port %d has SDS %d\n", __func__, pn, 
> priv->ports[pn].sds_num);
>  
>               if (of_get_phy_mode(dn, &interface))
>                       interface = PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_NA;

Best regards,
Andreas


--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to