David Bauer <[email protected]> writes: > That being set, the goal of poemgr is not to replace the other > efforts. I'm sorry if I caused this impression.
Not my intention to complain at all. Just wanted those with a stake in this to be aware of your work. Thanks a lot for the efforts you have done to add complete support for this very interesting device. As well as many other devices. Connected to a Unifi 6 lite right now, so I do appreciate that work! And having these two implementations for widely different PoE systems is extremely useful for further "poe manager" design discussions. What I would want to avoid by posting is that we end up having two separate poe managers in OpenWrt (including "packages") forever... Which is how things look right now.. IMHO it would be better to combine them before mergin. Or at least agree on one of them as a basis for further developement and discussion, so we can avoid adding a userspace API which is doomed to go away soon. Bjørn _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
