Hi Arınç

> On Sep 17, 2021, at 3:17 AM, Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.u...@arinc9.com> wrote:
> 
> The current naming used on LuCI/UCI is inaccurate and confusing. The 
> “interfaces” under Network → Interfaces actually represent networks. The 
> actual interfaces are called “device”.

I agree that the terminology is confusing. I really struggled with the names 
when I added them into the preface to the DSA Mini-tutorial 
(https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/network/dsa/dsa-mini-tutorial). I did some 
research looking at the original DSA documentation: it didn't offer much in the 
way of definitions. So I followed my usual practice of documenting the lingo of 
whatever application I'm using.

After looking hard at how LuCI seemed to work, I wrote:

--------
        • Devices are physical connections that convey bits/frames to other 
computers. They operate at layer 2 in the protocol stack, have a MAC address 
along with several other configurable parameters...
                
        • Interfaces route IP packets and operate at layer 3 in the protocol 
stack. An interface is associated with a single device that sends/receives its 
packets. Interfaces get their IP address parameters by the choice of protocol...
---------

I haven't heard any corrections from others about these assertions, so I am 
hopeful that I got those definitions right. 

When you say that "interfaces... actually represent networks" I think you mean 
that they're "subnets" (and have a subnet address range, IP address, and other 
characteristics). Is that what you mean? Although I'm neither a Linux OS or 
network expert, I can see an explanation for using the terms "devices" and 
"interfaces" as defined above.

In this case, I believe it will be difficult to change the terminology used in 
OpenWrt/LuCI. I think that train has left the station. Perhaps our efforts will 
be best used toward documenting the syntax and GUI as it is today, so that 
people can configure their gear the way they want.

Best regards,

Rich
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to