The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.
--- Begin Message ---On 09.09.2021 23:26, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > On 8/30/21 11:39 AM, Claudiu Beznea wrote: >> Bump at91 targets to kernel v5.10. With this patches and files for >> wb45n and wb50n were removed as they are now included in upstream >> kernel. Along with this: >> - the kernel config for sam9x targets has been refreshed (with >> make kernel_menuconfig + save); >> - CONFIG_ARCH_AT91 and specific sam9x SoCs (AT91RM9200, AT91SAM9, >> SAM9X60) has been enabled such that sam9x SoCs to be able to boot. >> >> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.bez...@microchip.com> >> --- >> target/linux/at91/Makefile | 2 +- >> .../at91/files/arch/arm/boot/dts/wb45n.dts | 220 ------------------ >> .../at91/files/arch/arm/boot/dts/wb50n.dts | 113 --------- >> .../at91/files/arch/arm/boot/dts/wb50n.dtsi | 205 ---------------- >> target/linux/at91/image/sam9x.mk | 1 + >> target/linux/at91/image/sama5.mk | 1 + >> .../101-ARM-at91-build-dtb-for-q5xr5.patch | 10 + >> .../101-ARM-at91-build-dtb-for-q5xr5.patch | 10 - >> .../102-ARM-at91-build-dtb-for-wb45n.patch | 12 - >> ...2-ARM-at91-wb45n-fix-duplicate-label.patch | 20 -- >> .../103-ARM-at91-build-dtb-for-wb50n.patch | 12 - >> ...3-ARM-at91-wb50n-fix-duplicate-label.patch | 39 ---- >> target/linux/at91/sam9x/config-default | 105 ++++----- >> 13 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 693 deletions(-) >> delete mode 100644 target/linux/at91/files/arch/arm/boot/dts/wb45n.dts >> delete mode 100644 target/linux/at91/files/arch/arm/boot/dts/wb50n.dts >> delete mode 100644 target/linux/at91/files/arch/arm/boot/dts/wb50n.dtsi >> create mode 040000 target/linux/at91/patches-5.10 >> create mode 100644 >> target/linux/at91/patches-5.10/101-ARM-at91-build-dtb-for-q5xr5.patch >> delete mode 040000 target/linux/at91/patches-5.4 >> delete mode 100644 >> target/linux/at91/patches-5.4/101-ARM-at91-build-dtb-for-q5xr5.patch >> delete mode 100644 >> target/linux/at91/patches-5.4/102-ARM-at91-build-dtb-for-wb45n.patch >> delete mode 100644 >> target/linux/at91/patches-5.4/102-ARM-at91-wb45n-fix-duplicate-label.patch >> delete mode 100644 >> target/linux/at91/patches-5.4/103-ARM-at91-build-dtb-for-wb50n.patch >> delete mode 100644 >> target/linux/at91/patches-5.4/103-ARM-at91-wb50n-fix-duplicate-label.patch >> >> diff --git a/target/linux/at91/Makefile b/target/linux/at91/Makefile >> index fe6a93244a5f..e4da7fb7e7da 100644 >> --- a/target/linux/at91/Makefile >> +++ b/target/linux/at91/Makefile >> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ BOARDNAME:=Microchip (Atmel AT91) >> FEATURES:=ext4 squashfs targz usb usbgadget ubifs >> SUBTARGETS:=sama5 sam9x >> -KERNEL_PATCHVER:=5.4 >> +KERNEL_PATCHVER:=5.10 >> include $(INCLUDE_DIR)/target.mk >> > Hi, > > Is the sama5 subtarget still building after this change? Hi! I just tested it again now, doing make distclean before, and its working. > > I am surprise that there is no change to the > target/linux/at91/sama5/config-default file done in this update from kernel > 5.4 to 5.10. > > Hauke
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
