W dniu 15.06.2021 o 16:05, Koen Vandeputte pisze: > > On 13.06.21 18:28, Tomasz Maciej Nowak wrote: >> Looking at OpenWrt downloading statistics this target has non-existent >> userbase apart from me. Mark it as source-only to skip the build by >> buildbots and not waste further the resources. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Maciej Nowak <tmn...@gmail.com> >> --- >> >> I'll keep this target in good condition in forseable future. If anyone >> would suggest to drop the target, I'm not opposed. > I've been thinking for some time to try to support nvidia Jetson (and some > carrier boards)
Great, finally someone interested in this niche target. > as L4T is really .. really buggy and running way behind. Looks like not much changed since Tegra 2 days. > Also some commonly used packages are also present in OpenWRT like gstreamer, > opencv, .. Hmm..., last time I checked NVIDIA usually only provided modified binaries for user-space. In Tegra2&3 days they rarely published the sources of their changes, only compiled libraries with headers, did it change since that time? Did they start to push their implementations upstream? > > I was thinking to use this target as a guideline for trying to do that. This would be similar split as in mvebu, where one subtarget would be armv7 and second one a armv8. They probably won't share many drivers, but that's not much of a concern. The boot procedure probably changed which means the SD card image structure also changed, but that shouldn't be much of a problem. > > Would you be interested? Yes, I'll gladly help with it in any way I can. > > Regards, > > Koen > Regards. -- TMN _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
