On 2021-05-17 16:49, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > From: Rafał Miłecki <ra...@milecki.pl> > > Interfaces need to be assigned to devices. For that purpose a "device" > option should be more accurate than "ifname" one. > > For backward compatibility add a temporary config translation. > > Config example: > > config device > option name 'lan' > option type 'bridge' > list ports 'lan1' > list ports 'lan2' > > config interface 'home' > option device 'lan' > option proto 'static' > > Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <ra...@milecki.pl> While I agree that the 'device' name would fit better than 'ifname', the fallback config translation is not enough in this case. netifd supports adding dynamic interfaces via ubus, where the config data is provided as blobmsg. You could update the in-tree users of that, but I don't know if there are any out-of-tree downstream users of this functionality that you would be breaking with this change.
- Felix _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
