On 2021-02-27 05:17, Rosen Penev wrote: > No package here depends on it. Furthermore, uClibc++ is a fairly buggy > C++ library and seems to be relatively inactive upstream. > > It also lacks proper support for modern C++11 features. > > The main benefit of it is size: 66.6 KB vs 287.3 KB on mips24kc. Static > linking and LTO can help bring the size down of packages that need it. > > Added warning message to uclibc++.mk > > Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <ros...@gmail.com> I've been using iperf with uclibc++ for a long time. I know quite a few other people using it as well. I'd really appreciate it if you could change iperf to link just libstdc++ statically (rest should still be dynamic) in order to avoid pushing >200 KB of extra bloat (after compression!) onto iperf users. I realize that removing unmaintained packages is tempting, but please consider the fallout.
- Felix _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
