Hi, > -----Original Message----- > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] > On Behalf Of Tomasz Maciej Nowak > Sent: Dienstag, 1. Dezember 2020 18:30 > To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > Subject: [PATCH] ath79: restore sysupgrade support for ja76pf2 and > routerstations > > Because the bug described in FS#2428 has been fixed with bf2870c > ("kernel: fix mtd partition erase < parent_erasesize writes") these devices > can now safely do sysupgrade. Restore sysupgrade support disabled > in: > 0cc87b3 ("ath79: image: disable sysupgrade images for routerstations and > ja76pf2") > and > cc5256a ("ath79: base-files: disable sysupgrade for routerstations and > ja76pf2")
I'm merging this one with a few minor adjustments. > +define Build/combined-image > + sh $(TOPDIR)/scripts/combined-image.sh \ > + "$(IMAGE_KERNEL)" \ > + "$@" \ > + "$@.new" > + @mv $@.new $@ > +endef I wonder whether we can merge this with the similar function from ath25 and put it back into image-commands.mk. The only difference seems that ath25 uses the $(IMAGE_ROOTFS) argument, while we use the rootfs set up in $@. Do you have an opinion on that? Best Adrian
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
