On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 12:54 PM Zoltan HERPAI <wigy...@uid0.hu> wrote: >> On 09/04/2020 11:25, Adrian Schmutzler wrote: >> Zoltan HERPAI <wigy...@uid0.hu> wrote: >>> Sure, a bit late, but there is hardware out there which would benefit from >>> recent OpenWrt (old ubnt gear, fonera, ... some of them 8/32). >>> But in terms of resources, ath25 is more advanced than good-old bcm47xx >>> and also played an important role in OpenWrt history. >> >> I'm not opposed to adding it back in general, but from a quick look it >> appears to me that devices are either at least 4/32 or broken? >> >> So, effectively we would add it just for custom builds and packages. >> > Indeed some of the devices are 4/32 or even 4/16 in ath25, but there are a > number of 8/32 devices (like Fon2202, Meraki Mini, Ubiquiti PS5, and likely > other custom boards). So above the nostalgic feeling, there is some technical > reasoning to keep the target around, I'm in favour of that.
Looks like I was wrong in assuming there are no active users of these boards. I will send another series that reverts target dropping and updates the kernel to 5.4. -- Sergey _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
