Hi, Henrique, On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 at 14:00, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <henri...@nic.br> wrote: > > Unless the size savings are very high to justify it, it is probably a > very bad idea to disable SuS-v2 support in busybox. > > And it would need to be a sizeable reduction to be worth it indeed: as > you already noticed, some of it will be lost with compatibility syntax > changes. > > Removing SuSv2 from busybox is too damn likely to bite people badly > downstream. Please reconsider. This is *NOT* a "no-brainer" change, it > is a tidal wave that ripples down to everything that uses OpenWRT, every > feed, every downstream, and users.
You are absolutely right, and I found it out the hard way by going down this rabbit hole. Please disregard this patch, as well as the one I sent to change the default behaviour of BusyBox. It's just not worth the hassle and potential issues, at all. Sorry for the noise, Rui _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
