Hey! There's an ongoing discussion in the ModemManager package in github related to how the MTU may be configured in the network interface based on what the MM bearer object reports: https://github.com/openwrt/packages/issues/11383
E.g.: $ ip route show default via 25.225.105.222 dev wwan0 proto static src 25.225.105.221 mtu 1430 Looks like the protocol handler implementation for netifd may allow setting the MTU to the routes associated with the network interface, instead of assigning the MTU value to the interface itself. Are both methods completely equivalent? Is there any reason to avoid setting the MTU in the interface when using netifd, or just not implemented yet? Cheers! -- Aleksander https://aleksander.es _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
