Hi Adrian, El dom., 17 may. 2020 a las 19:00, <m...@adrianschmutzler.de> escribió: > > Hi, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] > > On Behalf Of Daniel González Cabanelas > > Sent: Sonntag, 17. Mai 2020 18:52 > > To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > > Cc: nolt...@gmail.com > > Subject: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] bcm63xx: Livebox1: reenable the image > > generation > > > > This old BCM6348 device still runs quite fine with OpenWrt snapshots when > > the board is modded with 64MB of RAM. > > > > Reenable the image generation and advertise the mod in the image filename > > OpenWrt does not officially support modded devices. If you require something > like that, just build the appropriate image yourself.
I was't aware of that rule. I thought this project was engaged with the spirit of hacking (software or hardware). Furthermore, one of features which leaded Openwrt success was the hardware modding. Without hardware modding a lot of devices couldn't be supported. This fact has no discussion for me. Appart from that, this is the only one device in the bcm63xx target with Redboot support. Without the image generation it will be difficult to test otherwise. Therefore the support should be also dropped for this kernel subtarget if no one cares about testing the snapshot images appart from me. This is a bit sad, but would make more sense. Of course I can build my own images. But I don't make tests or fix issues on this device only for myself but also for others. So, with no image generation I will probably stop testing snapshots on this device. As a result of this, I won't either detect and fix other issues on this target as I made in the past. > Despite that, I don't think the way you modify the image name would fit the > naming logic on that target very well. Not sure about what's wrong with this naming logic. I made it the most concise and less disruptive I could. Regards. Daniel. > > I will mark this patch as Rejected. Sorry. > > Best > > Adrian > > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel González Cabanelas <dgcb...@gmail.com> > > --- > > target/linux/bcm63xx/image/bcm63xx.mk | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/target/linux/bcm63xx/image/bcm63xx.mk > > b/target/linux/bcm63xx/image/bcm63xx.mk > > index d5601e2c3c..1e5b0b9776 100644 > > --- a/target/linux/bcm63xx/image/bcm63xx.mk > > +++ b/target/linux/bcm63xx/image/bcm63xx.mk > > @@ -759,7 +759,7 @@ define Device/inventel_livebox-1 > > DEVICE_MODEL := Livebox 1 > > SOC := bcm6348 > > DEVICE_PACKAGES := $(B43_PACKAGES) $(USB1_PACKAGES) > > - DEFAULT := n > > + IMAGE_NAME = $$(IMAGE_PREFIX)-64RAM_mod-$$(1).$$(2) > > endef > > TARGET_DEVICES += inventel_livebox-1 > > > > -- > > 2.26.2 > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > openwrt-devel mailing list > > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
