On 20.04.2020 at 21:42 <m...@adrianschmutzler.de> wrote: > > Please share your thoughts. > I think about it.
My proposal: Three steps of convention: 1. Use name from device, when is described at chassis. 2. Use variant "2", when ports have only numbers. lanX, where X is number from chassis. 3. Use natural port numeration from switch IC when ports isn't described at all. in this case could be used neutral names, e.g. "portX". I think, most important for users is to easy recognize which port is used. Regards, Pawel Dembicki _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
