On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 2:25 PM Rosen Penev <ros...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 7:45 AM Petr Štetiar <yn...@true.cz> wrote: > > > > Rosen Penev <ros...@gmail.com> [2020-03-20 16:45:06]: > > > > > The SYS_settimeofday is no longer present. That is, it's replaced with the > > > time32 variant. There is no time64 variant. > > > > FYI upstream email "busybox 1.31.1 build issues with glibc-2.31 and musl > > 1.2.0"[1] mentions other fixes as well. If more fixing is needed, it would > > be > > nice to handle it via upstream first, thanks.> > > > > 1. http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/2020-March/087843.html > I looked into those. I did not need to backport these in order to get > busybox to compile. I assume it would break under custom conditions. > > Note that the last patch adds a dependency on librt (part of libc for > musl and uClibc-ng but not glibc). > > I think this patch is good enough for now. Turns out, this breaks builds on uClibc-ng. Will roll a new version when I can.
I question what this patch is for. More details: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/13305#issuecomment-520463236 My reading of it is that it's there for kmod-fs-fat/udf/hfs compatibility. It's also deprecated. Hence no time64 version. Wonder if this patch should simply be removed. > > > > -- ynezz _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel