On Sat Mar 21, 2020 at 5:41 AM PST, Alexander 'lynxis' Couzens wrote: > Hi Paul, > Hi Robert, > > > Sorry, I did not know about that situation but after a look it seems > > that squashfs-tools is more up to date that the fork. > > There has been a 4.4 release and couple of patches each month to it. > > you're right! I would like to discontinue squashfskit. It had it's > reason, but there are now 2 options: > > a) the upstream is more active and even made it reproducible > b) there is a full rewrite squashfs-ng
Long time ago I created a patch to use quashfs-ng as a full replacement of squashfskit/squashfs-tools. It is not fully implemented but maybe somebody wants to use it as an inspriation for further testing. https://github.com/aparcar/openwrt/pull/1 > For now, I'll test the patch und merge it later. Maybe I'll also have > the time evaluate the upstream and squashfs-ng. Best, Paul _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
