> -----Original Message----- > From: Luis Araneda [mailto:luaran...@gmail.com] > Sent: Freitag, 13. März 2020 22:51 > To: Petr Štetiar <yn...@true.cz> > Cc: Adrian Schmutzler <m...@adrianschmutzler.de>; openwrt- > de...@lists.openwrt.org > Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/3] zynq: copy config from kernel > 4.19 to 5.4 > > Hi, > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 9:34 AM Petr Štetiar <yn...@true.cz> wrote: > > > > Adrian Schmutzler <m...@adrianschmutzler.de> [2020-03-13 13:17:42]: > > > > > I'm aware of the two-step procedure (1. copy without changes, 2. > > > refresh), I just read the message in a way that the config was > > > refreshed _before_ copying it? > > > > Yep, Luis did exactly what he described in his commit description, he > > really refreshed the 4.19 config first (IIRC two symbols refreshed?) > > and copied it to 5.4. > > > > That's probably the pedantic way, fixing first 4.19 config, then > > refresh it for 5.4, so the diff for 5.4 contains only symbols related > > to 5.4, not to 4.19 cleanup/refresh. > > That's exactly what I did. > My apologies if it caused any inconvenience, but I thought that an additional > commit for just two symbols (one removed, one added) was not necessary. > > Please let me know if you want a refresh commit in the future (next kernel > version?) even if it just a couple of symbols.
As Petr stated, you did everything right, I was commenting based on wrong assumptions. Best Adrian > > Regards, > Luis Araneda.
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
