Hi, > -----Original Message----- > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] On > Behalf Of Russell Senior > Sent: Mittwoch, 26. Februar 2020 11:20 > To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > Subject: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH RFC] ath79: add support for the ar7240 version > of the ubiquiti bullet > > > The Ubiquiti Bullet M2HP come in two flavors, based on ar7240 and > ar7241. Both are supported by ar71xx, despite the different SoCs. The > ath79 target, however, currently supports only the ar7241. The ar7240 > version apparently has a differently wired ethernet interface and the > ar7241-based image comes up on the ar7240-based versions without a > working ethernet interface. > > This is an attempt to support both flavors of ubnt-bullet-m, > separately. Some of the choices I made may be considered dubious and/or > harmful.
Interesting. Do you have any indications whether this will also affect the Loco M and Picostation XM devices? What's the base for the v0/v1 distinction? Is that visible to the user somehow? I fear that meaningful naming will be the biggest problem here... Best Adrian _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
