Hello Adrian, On 1/2/20 4:25 PM, m...@adrianschmutzler.de wrote: > while I appreciate your patch, the choice of phy0tpt vs. phy1tpt looks > strange to me for several devices. E.g. for C20i you are converting a > phy0radio to a phy1tpt. Is this a mistake or a misunderstanding from my side?
This is due to a previously false trigger assignment. The device only has 1 WiFi LED. OpenWrt in this case maps the LED to the 2.4 GHz radio. phy0 however is the MT7610 chip (which is probed prior to rt2x00), so this is wrong for the device. This most likely happened, as the board was introduced without support for the M7610. When the MT7610 was introduced later, the LED trigger was not changed (as the 2.4GHz radio became phy1). I will add a note to the commit message, a separate patch for this change however is superfluous. Best wishes David _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
