On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 5:47 AM Paul Oranje <p...@oranjevos.nl> wrote:
>
> Happy new year !
>
> A minor question/nitpick, see below.
> Regards
>
> > Op 1 jan. 2020, om 03:01 heeft Rosen Penev <ros...@gmail.com> het volgende
> > geschreven:
> >
> > The former are not well defined.
> >
> > Found with shellcheck.
> [skip]
>
> > - [ -d "$BASEDIR/files" -a \! -L "$BASEDIR/files" ] && {
> > + if [ -d "$BASEDIR/files" ] && [ \! -L
> > "$BASEDIR/files" ]; then
> > mkdir -p "$ENVDIR/files"
> > shopt -s dotglob
> > mv "$BASEDIR/files/"* "$ENVDIR/files/"
> > 2>/dev/null
> > shopt -u dotglob
> > rmdir "$BASEDIR/files"
> > - }
> > + fi
> Why has " ... && { ... }" syntax been replaced with "if ... then ... fi" ?
> Both forms are used in the script anyway.
It's clearer. One issue with replacing -a with && is the case of [ 1
-a 2 ] ||. [ 1 ] && [ 2 ] || has the wrong behaviour. It's not the
case here but generally speaking it's more correct to replace with an
if statement.
Please also Reply to All next time.
>
> [skip]
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
