W dniu 2019-12-06 o 18:44, Joe Ayers pisze:

Possibly the same symptoms don't exist on 128MB RAM devices.
Like there is some if condition, which is doing some nasty things on 64M
devices? I admit, that I don't have ath10k-ct source code under my pillow, but
it doesn't make much sense to me.

Comparable results between above and my 64MB device.   However, if the
sleep time is extended the consumption is more
Ok, I'll let it run overnight with 120s sleep in between.

I suspect this is not the intended behavior.
No its not and it's even strange, that I'm not seeing it here if it should
happen in the "default setup". Maybe its because:

1. You're using custom image (I'm using official prebuilt images)
2. You're not providing all the steps needed to reproduce the issue
3. I've way different hardware

Every detail could make huge difference.

-- ynezz
On the device I am testing, it is both (2GHz) ath9k and (5GHz) ath10k.
   These look to be related patches to this issue:

960-0010-ath10k-limit-htt-rx-ring-size.patch
960-0011-ath10k-limit-pci-buffer-size.patch

In the v19.07.0-rc2 build for the rb-nor-flash-16M-ac ar71xx image,
these patches are applied to backports-4.19.85-1, but don't seem to be
applied to ath10k-ct-2019-09-09-5e8cd86f.    Should ath10k-ct have
these and other patches?    The device's installed packages do include
ath10k-ct (from downloads.openwrt.org installed image).

Joe AE6XE

_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
.

I can only add that I got the same behaviour with my TL-WR902AC just ported to ath79 on master (based on f19e471f3206d0b5885490e52972085d2da2a10b). In about 20 minutes system was unusable - I couldn't fully copy a 4MB sysupgrade image to /tmp. Branch used to build the image is here: https://github.com/Leo-PL/openwrt/commits/tl-wr902ac-v1_ath79

I can offer my help with testing the fixes, as it seems to me that it's not the first time I observe this issue, only now I got a device affected by it.

With kind regards,
Lech


_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to